Actually, unless there are new thoughts in practice (pun), the term NLP refers to
Neuro-Linguistic Programming, you drunk foo. Interestingly enough, I think we can come up with our own stigma to achieve the results you mention. By the way, does something that has not been validated, or non-validated, mean the same thing as something invalid?
Let's see, we need to come up with new NLP terms that invoke stigma on the female persuasion, and then test our theories in the field. If we do not get the results we want, we will try new "tools," retest our theories, and find the results. This sounds strangely like what I have done every weekend since I was 15. Oddly enough, though the results were quite satisfactory through my 20's, I found that I had to modify my tools and theories and retest them in my 30's. I am still conducting tests and find that there are also permutations to the theories when alcohol is involved. The drivers for the tools I use in these experiments are linguistic cues, driven or influenced by sudden thoughts, and tested using verbal commands, instructions, or persuasions. I call these Accute Neuro-Alkaline Linguistics, or ANAL. Captain Heinous has left the lab...
